---
title: "Where AI video actually gets paid: the ad desk, not the cinema"
date: 2026-11-02
category: Generative Media
site: NeuroAI
canonical: https://neuroai.site/a/na-aigc-ai-video-ads-bigger-buyer
language: en
---

# Where AI video actually gets paid: the ad desk, not the cinema

> Kuaishou's quarterly numbers show AI-produced video earning its keep in advertising — AIGC short-video ad spend up over 70%, microdrama ad spend up over 100% — while the film-industry story stays mostly anecdotal.

A performance marketer opens a dashboard at 9am and needs forty variants of a fifteen-second spot by lunch. No director is on the call. That daily scramble — not a film festival premiere — is where AI-made video in China currently turns into revenue, and for once a listed company has published the numbers that show it.

## Key takeaways

- Kuaishou says AIGC short-video advertising consumption grew more than 70% year on year in the second quarter of 2026, after it shipped creative-production agents for different industries.

- Microdrama supply on the platform was more than five times its January level by June, and microdrama advertising consumption more than doubled year on year.

- More than 850,000 merchants used Kuaishou's free AI operating tools in the first half of 2026, covering listing, creative, diagnostics, bidding and customer service.

- Kling (可灵), Kuaishou's video model, earned over 850 million yuan (≈US$120 million) in the quarter, and is now explicitly sold to advertising and film professionals with native 4K output.

## The only place AI video spend is actually disclosed

Film stories get the headlines; advertising gets the line items. In Kuaishou's second-quarter 2026 results, the company broke out where generative video touched its own business:

- **Creative production.** Kuaishou launched industry-specific creative agents during the quarter, and AIGC short-video marketing consumption rose more than 70% year on year.

- **Microdrama supply.** Including both live-action and AI-made titles, microdrama (短剧) supply on the platform was more than five times its January level by June, and second-quarter microdrama advertising consumption grew more than 100% year on year.

- **Merchant tooling.** Over 850,000 merchants used the company's free AI operating tools in the first half, spanning product selection and listing, creative production, business diagnostics, smart bidding and smart customer service.

- **Measurement.** Penetration of the net-transaction ROI product rose from 45% of clients in the first quarter to 55% in the second.

Context matters: total revenue was 35.5 billion yuan for the quarter, of which online marketing services were 20.6 billion yuan. That is the pool generative video is feeding, and it is roughly two orders of magnitude larger than what the model business itself bills.

## Why advertising absorbs video faster than film does

Three properties of ad work make it the natural first home for machine-made footage.

**Tolerance for imperfect takes.** A fifteen-second performance spot is judged on click-through and conversion, not on continuity across ninety minutes. A slightly odd hand is a cost only if it hurts the metric.

**Volume economics.** Ad buying rewards variant count. When one concept can be rendered in forty versions and the system then picks the winner, the value of generation is measured in throughput rather than in craft.

**Closed-loop feedback.** Kuaishou's own description of the chain — creative generation, user matching, smart bidding, conversion — means the output of generation feeds directly into a measurable result. Film has no equivalent loop; its feedback arrives months later and in box office.

Kling has been steered accordingly. The 3.0 series added native 4K output aimed at film and advertising clients, a Turbo tier balancing motion quality with audio sync, and MCP and CLI interfaces so agents can drive batch creation. Kuaishou also noted that two commercials made with heavy use of Kling won three awards — one silver, two bronze — in the first AI Craft category at the Cannes Lions festival, and that a short film, *Paper Phone* (纸手机), made by two creators in three days passed 100 million views.

## The part that should worry studios

The demand is real but it is not the demand filmmakers imagine. Rising ad consumption from machine-made creative means the marginal buyer of video generation is a performance desk with a daily budget, not a producer with a slate. That buyer cares about cost per usable variant and about whether the platform's own bidding model will push the clip.

It also means the economics of the supply side are tightening from the other end. Kuaishou reported research and development spending of 4.58 billion yuan in the quarter, up 34.7%, largely on model training, while group gross margin slipped to 51.6%. Cheap creative raises advertiser consumption; it does not automatically raise anyone's margin.

According to Li An, chief scientist at BrainNet (脑机网), the shift to watch is not whether machines can make a beautiful shot but who captures the surplus when creative becomes cheap — platforms with the bidding model, or the studios that used to bill by the shooting day.

## Honest limitations

All the growth percentages here come from one company's quarterly disclosure and the earnings material built from it; Kuaishou measures "AIGC short-video marketing consumption" on its own definitions, and its methodology is not comparable with another platform's. No other major Chinese platform publishes an equivalent number, so this cannot be generalised to the whole market without risk — Douyin, Tencent Ads and WeChat's ad system may look quite different and their internal figures are not public. The awards and the short film are company-selected showcases, not representative outcomes. The 850,000-merchant figure counts use of free tools, which is a very low bar for adoption and says nothing about retention or paid conversion. Nothing here measures how much revenue generative video adds versus how much it merely redistributes among advertisers.

## What readers can do now

- If you run performance creative, measure cost per *usable* variant, not cost per render. A 70% rise in ad consumption means little if your discard rate is 90%; instrument the funnel from generation to click-through.

- If you sell production services, price the judgement, not the output. The deliverable that still commands a fee is knowing which of forty versions is the right one, and why.

- Watch the platform's own ROI products rather than the model leaderboards. In this market, distribution and bidding decide whether a cheap clip becomes revenue — penetration of Kuaishou's ROI product moving from 45% to 55% in one quarter tells you where the leverage is.

---

Published by NeuroAI (https://neuroai.site/) — https://neuroai.site/a/na-aigc-ai-video-ads-bigger-buyer
Free to quote with attribution and a link to the original.
